TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems

See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
19
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems with 16% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Recovery.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Management and Governance(3 mappings)

AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance3 targets
→GAMP5-KC-3Critical Thinking
→GAMP5-SV-1User Requirements Specification (URS)
→GAMP5-SV-2Functional Specification (FS)

Incident Response and Recovery(3 mappings)

AWWA-5.3Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
→GAMP5-OP-1Operational Management
AWWA-5.4Backup and Restoration
→GAMP5-OP-1Operational Management
AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
→GAMP5-OP-1Operational Management

Related Comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CSA CCM v418 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs South Korea ISMS-P18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs Azure Security Benchmark16 mappings

Other ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems5 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems5 mappingsRhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA) vs ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems5 mappingsWisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) vs ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems5 mappingsConnecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA) vs ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems5 mappingsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) vs ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems5 mappingsICH Q10 — Pharmaceutical Quality System vs ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems5 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems?

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 25 controls across its framework, while ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems covers 17 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Recovery, where 6 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems?

Of 25 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 4 map directly to ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems?

21 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Recovery with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and ISPE GAMP 5 — A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerised Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Recovery (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.