TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

34
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity with 52% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(12 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition3 targets
→NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs
→NRC73-PROG-02Scope — Critical Digital Assets
→NRC73-PROG-04Cybersecurity Assessment
AWS-WA-02Cloud security policy and strategy3 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-03Cloud Security
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment3 targets
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
AWS-WA-05Cloud security roles and responsibilities3 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-03Cloud Security
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud2 targets
→MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data3 targets
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-16Virtual network segmentation2 targets
→KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security
→NZ-NZISM-SC-02ICT Security Controls
AWS-WA-19Image and template hardening
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue

+14 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CAIQ (CSA)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs C5 (Germany)19 mappings

Other NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity17 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity17 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity17 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity16 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity16 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity16 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity16 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud, where 4 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 13 map directly to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity?

12 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity. The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.