TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
80
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) with 10% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 89 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 80 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Identity & Access Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 89 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cloud Security Overview(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain1-2-Governance-IdentificationHKMA C-RAF Domain 1 (Governance) + Domain 2 (Identification) - Cyber Strategy, Risk Management, Asset Management, Threat Assessment
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain1-2-Governance-IdentificationHKMA C-RAF Domain 1 (Governance) + Domain 2 (Identification) - Cyber Strategy, Risk Management, Asset Management, Threat Assessment

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain3-4-Protection-DetectionHKMA C-RAF Domain 3 (Protection) + Domain 4 (Detection) - Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing, Threat Intel
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain5-6-Response-Recovery-SitAwarenessHKMA C-RAF Domain 5 (Response and Recovery) + Domain 6 (Situational Awareness) - Incident Response, Recovery, Threat Landscape, Information Sharing

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-19Image and template hardening
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain3-4-Protection-DetectionHKMA C-RAF Domain 3 (Protection) + Domain 4 (Detection) - Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing, Threat Intel
AWS-WA-20Cloud configuration management
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain3-4-Protection-DetectionHKMA C-RAF Domain 3 (Protection) + Domain 4 (Detection) - Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing, Threat Intel

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain3-4-Protection-DetectionHKMA C-RAF Domain 3 (Protection) + Domain 4 (Detection) - Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing, Threat Intel
AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain5-6-Response-Recovery-SitAwarenessHKMA C-RAF Domain 5 (Response and Recovery) + Domain 6 (Situational Awareness) - Incident Response, Recovery, Threat Landscape, Information Sharing
AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain3-4-Protection-DetectionHKMA C-RAF Domain 3 (Protection) + Domain 4 (Detection) - Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing, Threat Intel

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14619 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14419 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISMAP (Japan)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappings

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

Ghana Cybersecurity Act vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) - Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsTEFCA - Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsGLBA vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 89 controls across its framework, while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Identity & Access Management, where 15 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

Of 89 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 9 map directly to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 80 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

80 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). The highest concentration of gaps is in Identity & Access Management with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Identity & Access Management (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.