TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) with 36% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition2 targets
→CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy
→CRAF-1.4Cyber Risk Roles and Responsibilities
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment
→CRAF-2.2Risk and Threat Assessment

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
→CRAF-3.2Data Security
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
→CRAF-5.3Recovery and Resilience

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-19Image and template hardening
→CRAF-3.3Infrastructure Security
AWS-WA-20Cloud configuration management
→CRAF-3.3Infrastructure Security

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→CRAF-4.4Anomaly Detection
AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud2 targets
→CRAF-5.1Incident Response Planning
→CRAF-5.2Incident Response Execution
AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management
→CRAF-4.3Security Testing

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CAIQ (CSA)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs C5 (Germany)19 mappings

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)15 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)15 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)14 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)13 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud, where 5 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 9 map directly to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

16 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.