TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human ResearchvsUnion Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013

See exactly how Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls map to Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research maps to Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 with 16% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Section 4 — Ethical Considerations Specific to Participants.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Governance and Oversight(9 mappings)

Art. 17Governance Structure2 targets
→Art. 41Exemptions from Certain GDPR Provisions
→Art. 8Data Categories
Art. 19Consent Management Controls4 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 40Establishment and Composition
→Art. 47Existing Legal Procedures
→Art. 8Data Categories
DMF-1.1Data Governance Structure
→Art. 16Data Quality
DMF-1.2Roles and Responsibilities2 targets
→Art. 41Exemptions from Certain GDPR Provisions
→Art. 8Data Categories

Related Comparisons

Other Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research comparisons

Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs Australia My Health Records Act 20125 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs ILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977)5 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673)5 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs ISO 8000 — Data Quality5 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule5 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles5 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience5 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs WHO Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020-20255 mappings

Other Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 comparisons

FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappingsISO 8000 — Data Quality vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappingsPrivacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappingsBS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappingsSouth Korea PIPA vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20139 mappingsAPPI vs Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/20138 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research and Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013?

Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research has 25 controls across its framework, while Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Section 4 — Ethical Considerations Specific to Participants, where 4 Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls have no direct Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research and Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013?

Of 25 total Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls, 4 map directly to Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research to Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013?

21 Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls have no direct equivalent in Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013. The highest concentration of gaps is in Section 4 — Ethical Considerations Specific to Participants with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research and Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013?

The domain with the highest gap count is Section 4 — Ethical Considerations Specific to Participants (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.