TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human ResearchvsEU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988)

See exactly how Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls map to EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research maps to EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988) with 16% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Section 4 — Ethical Considerations Specific to Participants.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Governance and Oversight(20 mappings)

Art. 17Governance Structure5 targets
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 53Administrative Misconducts
→Art. 8Data Categories
→Part 1, Sec. 4Application and Scope
Art. 19Consent Management Controls9 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
→Art. 30Privacy Policy
→Art. 40Establishment and Composition
→Art. 47Existing Legal Procedures
→Art. 53Administrative Misconducts
→Art. 8Data Categories
→JOR-1Scope and Definitions (Article 1–2)
→PY-2Definitions
DMF-1.1Data Governance Structure
→Art. 16Data Quality
DMF-1.2Roles and Responsibilities5 targets
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 53Administrative Misconducts
→Art. 8Data Categories
→Part 1, Sec. 4Application and Scope

Related Comparisons

Other Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research comparisons

Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs Australia My Health Records Act 20125 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs ILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977)5 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673)5 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs ISO 8000 — Data Quality5 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule5 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles5 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience5 mappingsAustralia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research vs WHO Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020-20255 mappings

Other EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988) comparisons

Lebanon Electronic Transactions and Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 81/2018) vs EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988)19 mappingsConnecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA) vs EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988)19 mappingsWisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670) vs EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988)19 mappingsTennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA) vs EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988)19 mappingsDigital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA) vs EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988)19 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988)18 mappingsJordan Draft Personal Data Protection Law (2022) vs EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988)18 mappingsColorado Privacy Act (CPA) vs EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988)17 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research and EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988)?

Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research has 25 controls across its framework, while EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988) covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Section 4 — Ethical Considerations Specific to Participants, where 4 Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls have no direct EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research and EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988)?

Of 25 total Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls, 4 map directly to EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research to EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988)?

21 Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls have no direct equivalent in EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988). The highest concentration of gaps is in Section 4 — Ethical Considerations Specific to Participants with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research and EU General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR, Regulation 2023/988)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Section 4 — Ethical Considerations Specific to Participants (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.