Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human ResearchvsAlbania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)

See exactly how Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls map to Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research maps to Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) with 16% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Section 4 — Ethical Considerations Specific to Participants.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Governance and Oversight(10 mappings)

Art. 17Governance Structure3 targets
AL-DPA-1Article 1 — Object of the Law
AL-DPA-3Article 3 — Definitions
BA-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions
Art. 19Consent Management Controls3 targets
AL-DPA-12Article 16 — Security Obligations
AO-DPA-13Article 17 — Confidentiality Obligations
BA-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions
DMF-1.1Data Governance Structure
AL-DPA-7Article 7 — Data Quality Principles
DMF-1.2Roles and Responsibilities3 targets
AL-DPA-1Article 1 — Object of the Law
AL-DPA-3Article 3 — Definitions
BA-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions

Related Comparisons

Other Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research comparisons

Other Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research and Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)?

Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research has 25 controls across its framework, while Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Section 4 — Ethical Considerations Specific to Participants, where 4 Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls have no direct Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research and Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)?

Of 25 total Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls, 4 map directly to Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research to Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)?

21 Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research controls have no direct equivalent in Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014). The highest concentration of gaps is in Section 4 — Ethical Considerations Specific to Participants with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research and Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Section 4 — Ethical Considerations Specific to Participants (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.