TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors ProgramvsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments

See exactly how Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 17% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Reporting and Maintenance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Assessor Qualifications(1 mappings)

IRAP-1Australian Citizenship and Clearance
→PAS1192-5-SC-02Personnel Security

Assessment Framework(3 mappings)

IRAP-8Risk Assessment3 targets
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud

Related Comparisons

Other Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program comparisons

Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)2 mappingsAustralia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule2 mappingsAustralia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements2 mappingsAustralia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program vs C-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism2 mappingsAustralia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program vs GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems2 mappingsAustralia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)2 mappingsAustralia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange2 mappingsAustralia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program vs Telecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR)2 mappings

Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program has 12 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Reporting and Maintenance, where 2 Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Of 12 total Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program controls, 2 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

10 Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in Reporting and Maintenance with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

The domain with the highest gap count is Reporting and Maintenance (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.