TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)vsPropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity

See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls map to PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
41
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) maps to PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity with 12% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Privacy and Security Safeguards(2 mappings)

CDR-11Data Minimization2 targets
→PTSS-4.1Tenant Data Protection
→PTSS-4.2Data Minimization

Consent and Authorization(4 mappings)

CDR-2Authorization Process
→PTSS-3.2Role-Based Access Control
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal3 targets
→PTSS-3.2Role-Based Access Control
→PTSS-4.1Tenant Data Protection
→PTSS-4.2Data Minimization

Data Holder Obligations(1 mappings)

CDR-6IT and Security Requirements
→PTSS-4.1Tenant Data Protection

Compliance and Enforcement(2 mappings)

EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance
→PTSS-2.3Traffic Monitoring and Intrusion Detection
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties
→PTSS-3.2Role-Based Access Control

Related Comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) comparisons

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia)18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs EU Digital Markets Act18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs FTC Health Breach Notification Rule18 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework17 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs CSA CCM v416 mappings

Other PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity comparisons

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity11 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity?

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) has 50 controls across its framework, while PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 36 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity?

Of 50 total Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls, 6 map directly to PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) to PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity?

44 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity. The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 36 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (36 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.