Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia AI Ethics FrameworkvsSerbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)

See exactly how Australia AI Ethics Framework controls map to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia AI Ethics Framework maps to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) with 8% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Data Governance(7 mappings)

AU-AI-14Privacy protection in AI training data5 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
Art. 29Safety Measures
Art. 30Privacy Policy
Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
AU-AI-15Data retention for AI models2 targets
Art. 45Data Protection Officer
Art. 64Transfer Based on Adequacy Decision

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Australia AI Ethics Framework and Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?

Australia AI Ethics Framework has 25 controls across its framework, while Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight, where 5 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls have no direct Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia AI Ethics Framework and Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?

Of 25 total Australia AI Ethics Framework controls, 2 map directly to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia AI Ethics Framework to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?

23 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls have no direct equivalent in Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia AI Ethics Framework and Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.