TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia AI Ethics FrameworkvsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments

See exactly how Australia AI Ethics Framework controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia AI Ethics Framework maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 20% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Risk Management(8 mappings)

AU-AI-01AI risk identification and assessment3 targets
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
AU-AI-02AI system categorization by risk level3 targets
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
→PAS1192-5-ST-01Security Triage Process
→PAS1192-5-ST-02Information Classification
AU-AI-04AI model validation and testing
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
AU-AI-05Ongoing AI risk monitoring
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management

Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Data Governance(1 mappings)

AU-AI-14Privacy protection in AI training data
→MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline

Related Comparisons

Other Australia AI Ethics Framework comparisons

Australia AI Ethics Framework vs ISO 4200112 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs IEEE 700012 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs OECD AI Principles12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs EU AI Act12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs UK AI Regulation Framework12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs China AI Regulations12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs Singapore AI Governance Framework12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs Japan AI Guidelines12 mappings

Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia AI Ethics Framework and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Australia AI Ethics Framework has 25 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight, where 5 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia AI Ethics Framework and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Of 25 total Australia AI Ethics Framework controls, 5 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia AI Ethics Framework to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

20 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia AI Ethics Framework and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

The domain with the highest gap count is Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.