TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience StandardvsAustralia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry

See exactly how ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls map to Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard maps to Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry with 23% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Checking and Corrective Action.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Policy and Planning(5 mappings)

4.3.1Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis3 targets
→EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
→EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
→HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
4.3.2Legal and Other Requirements2 targets
→CA-AODA-CE-02Accessibility Policy and Plan
→EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance

Implementation and Operation(5 mappings)

4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority3 targets
→CA-AODA-CE-02Accessibility Policy and Plan
→EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance
→US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
4.4.2Competence, Training, and Awareness2 targets
→CA-AODA-CE-02Accessibility Policy and Plan
→EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance

Incident Prevention, Preparedness, and Response(2 mappings)

4.4.7Emergency and Incident Response2 targets
→NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan
→US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting

Related Comparisons

Other ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard comparisons

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs Lloyd's Minimum Standards — Cyber Security6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs SSAE 18 — Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)6 mappings

Other Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry comparisons

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry16 mappingsNIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) vs Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry16 mappingsNotifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) vs Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry16 mappingsFTC Health Breach Notification Rule vs Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry16 mappingsUS SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework vs Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry16 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry15 mappingsUK Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act (PSTI) vs Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry15 mappingsEAR — Export Administration Regulations vs Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry?

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard has 22 controls across its framework, while Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Checking and Corrective Action, where 5 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry?

Of 22 total ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls, 5 map directly to Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard to Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry?

17 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct equivalent in Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry. The highest concentration of gaps is in Checking and Corrective Action with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and Australia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry?

The domain with the highest gap count is Checking and Corrective Action (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.