Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good PracticesvsTSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives

See exactly how ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls map to TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices maps to TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives with 36% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Board and Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Detect and Respond(5 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-DR-1Continuous Monitoring2 targets
SD-02-4Continuous Monitoring
SD-02-5Anomaly Detection
ASIC-CYB-DR-2Incident Response Plan
SD-02-8Incident Response Plan
SWIFT-DET-01Logging and Monitoring
SD-02-6Log Management
SWIFT-DET-04Cyber Incident Response
SD-02-8Incident Response Plan

Identify and Protect(3 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-ID-2Access Control2 targets
SD-02-2Access Control Measures
SD-02-3Multi-Factor Authentication
ASIC-CYB-ID-3Patch and Vulnerability Management
SD-01-4Remediation Planning

Resilience and Recovery(2 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-RES-1Business Continuity Planning
SD-02-8Incident Response Plan
ASIC-CYB-RES-2Recovery Testing
SD-02-9Contingency and Recovery Planning

Related Comparisons

Other ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices comparisons

Other TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives?

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices has 22 controls across its framework, while TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives covers 17 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Board and Governance, where 4 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives?

Of 22 total ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls, 8 map directly to TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices to TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives?

14 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct equivalent in TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives. The highest concentration of gaps is in Board and Governance with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives?

The domain with the highest gap count is Board and Governance (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.