Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good PracticesvsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0

See exactly how ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls map to NIST Privacy Framework 1.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices maps to NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 with 36% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Detect and Respond.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Board and Governance(6 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-GOV-1Board Oversight of Cyber Risk3 targets
NIST-PF-IU-02CSF Alignment
NIST-PF-PCF-01Identify-P and Govern-P
PF-GV.RM-P2Risk Tolerance Established
ASIC-CYB-GOV-2Cyber Risk in Enterprise Risk Management3 targets
NIST-PF-IU-02CSF Alignment
NIST-PF-PCF-01Identify-P and Govern-P
PF-GV.RM-P2Risk Tolerance Established

Identify and Protect(6 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-ID-2Access Control4 targets
NIST-PF-PCF-03Protect-P
PF-PR.AC-P1Identity Management and Access Control
PF-PR.AC-P4Access Permissions Managed
PF-PR.AC-P6Individuals Authenticated
ASIC-CYB-ID-3Patch and Vulnerability Management
PF-PR.PO-P9Human Resource Controls
ASIC-CYB-ID-4Configuration Management
PF-PR.PO-P1Baseline Configuration Established

Resilience and Recovery(4 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-RES-2Recovery Testing3 targets
PF-PR.PO-P3Backups Maintained
PF-PR.PO-P6Response and Recovery Plans Tested
PF-PR.PO-P8Response and Recovery Plans Managed
ASIC-CYB-RES-3Resilience by Design
PF-PR.DS-P4Adequate Capacity Maintained

Detect and Respond(1 mappings)

SWIFT-DET-01Logging and Monitoring
PF-PR.PO-P10Audit Log Policy Implemented

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices has 22 controls across its framework, while NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 covers 100 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Detect and Respond, where 7 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?

Of 22 total ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls, 8 map directly to NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices to NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?

14 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Privacy Framework 1.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Detect and Respond with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Detect and Respond (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.