TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good PracticesvsEU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD)

See exactly how ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls map to EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices maps to EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD) with 18% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Detect and Respond.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Board and Governance(2 mappings)

ASIC-CYB-GOV-1Board Oversight of Cyber Risk
→Art. 15Cybersecurity Requirements
ASIC-CYB-GOV-2Cyber Risk in Enterprise Risk Management
→Art. 15Cybersecurity Requirements

Detect and Respond(6 mappings)

SWIFT-DET-02Malware Protection3 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 8Data Categories
SWIFT-DET-04Cyber Incident Response3 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 8Data Categories

Related Comparisons

Other ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices comparisons

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs CSA CCM v413 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202412 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)12 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)12 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)12 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)12 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange12 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)12 mappings

Other EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD) comparisons

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD)12 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD)11 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD)11 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD)11 mappingsISO 8000 — Data Quality vs EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD)11 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD)11 mappingsPrivacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles vs EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD)11 mappingsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD)10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD)?

ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices has 22 controls across its framework, while EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD) covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Detect and Respond, where 6 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD) equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD)?

Of 22 total ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls, 4 map directly to EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD) controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices to EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD)?

18 ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls have no direct equivalent in EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD). The highest concentration of gaps is in Detect and Respond with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices and EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) – Draft Directive (2023/0317 COD)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Detect and Respond (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.