TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
46%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements with 46% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(6 mappings)

ASD37-06Email content filtering (Excellent)
→RTS 4.17Malware protection
ASD37-12Antivirus software with heuristics (Very Good)2 targets
→RTS 4.14User device and endpoint security
→RTS 4.17Malware protection
ASD37-16Antivirus software with signatures (Limited)2 targets
→RTS 4.14User device and endpoint security
→RTS 4.17Malware protection
ASD37-17TLS encryption between email servers (Limited)
→RTS 4.20Cryptography

Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents(7 mappings)

ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
→RTS 4.15Privileged access management
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)3 targets
→RTS 4.15Privileged access management
→RTS 4.16Authentication mechanisms
→RTS 4.22Network security
ASD37-22Network segmentation (Excellent)
→RTS 4.22Network security
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)
→RTS 4.16Authentication mechanisms
ASD37-25Software firewall - inbound (Very Good)
→RTS 4.22Network security

Detecting Cyber Security Incidents and Responding(6 mappings)

ASD37-29Host-based IDS/IPS (Very Good)2 targets
→RTS 4.19Logging and monitoring
→RTS 4.22Network security
ASD37-31Hunt to discover incidents (Very Good)
→RTS 4.5Incident management
ASD37-32Network-based IDS/IPS (Limited)2 targets
→RTS 4.19Logging and monitoring
→RTS 4.22Network security
ASD37-33Capture network traffic (Limited)
→RTS 4.5Incident management

Recovering Data and System Availability(1 mappings)

ASD37-34Regular backups (Essential)
→RTS 4.18Backup and recovery

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ISO 27001:202219 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange18 mappings

Other UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements17 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements17 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsPCI DSS v4.0 vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (46% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution, where 13 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 17 map directly to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls — representing 46% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

20 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.