Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsSLSA

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to SLSA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to SLSA with 32% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(4 mappings)

ASD37-06Email content filtering (Excellent)
SUPCHAIN-2Source Integrity - Branch Protection, Code Review, Two-Person Rule
ASD37-12Antivirus software with heuristics (Very Good)
SUPCHAIN-2Source Integrity - Branch Protection, Code Review, Two-Person Rule
ASD37-16Antivirus software with signatures (Limited)
SUPCHAIN-2Source Integrity - Branch Protection, Code Review, Two-Person Rule
ASD37-17TLS encryption between email servers (Limited)
SUPCHAIN-2Source Integrity - Branch Protection, Code Review, Two-Person Rule

Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents(7 mappings)

ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
SUPCHAIN-2Source Integrity - Branch Protection, Code Review, Two-Person Rule
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)3 targets
SUPCHAIN-1Build Integrity - Source, Build, Provenance
SUPCHAIN-2Source Integrity - Branch Protection, Code Review, Two-Person Rule
SUPCHAIN-3Dependency Verification and SBOM
ASD37-22Network segmentation (Excellent)
SUPCHAIN-3Dependency Verification and SBOM
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)
SUPCHAIN-1Build Integrity - Source, Build, Provenance
ASD37-25Software firewall - inbound (Very Good)
SUPCHAIN-3Dependency Verification and SBOM

Recovering Data and System Availability(3 mappings)

ASD37-34Regular backups (Essential)
SUPCHAIN-2Source Integrity - Branch Protection, Code Review, Two-Person Rule
ASD37-35Business continuity and disaster recovery plans (Very Good)
SUPCHAIN-2Source Integrity - Branch Protection, Code Review, Two-Person Rule
ASD37-36System recovery capabilities (Very Good)
SUPCHAIN-2Source Integrity - Branch Protection, Code Review, Two-Person Rule

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and SLSA?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while SLSA covers 4 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution, where 13 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct SLSA equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and SLSA?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 12 map directly to SLSA controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to SLSA?

25 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in SLSA. The highest concentration of gaps is in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and SLSA?

The domain with the highest gap count is Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.