Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsNIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 with 8% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents(6 mappings)

ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)3 targets
PR.AC-PIdentity Management, Authentication, and Access Control
PR.DS-PData Security
PR.PT-PProtective Technology
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)
PR.AC-PIdentity Management, Authentication, and Access Control
ASD37-27Outbound data loss prevention (Very Good)2 targets
PR.MA-PMaintenance
PR.PO-PData Protection Policies, Processes, and Procedures

Related Comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

Other NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution, where 17 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 3 map directly to NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0?

34 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution with 17 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution (17 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.