Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to NIST Privacy Framework 1.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

28
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 with 38% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(4 mappings)

ASD37-04User application hardening (Essential)
PF-PR.PO-P1Baseline Configuration Established
ASD37-10Server application hardening (Very Good)
PF-PR.PO-P1Baseline Configuration Established
ASD37-11Operating system hardening (Very Good)
PF-PR.PO-P1Baseline Configuration Established
ASD37-17TLS encryption between email servers (Limited)
NIST-PF-PCF-03Protect-P

Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents(14 mappings)

ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)2 targets
PF-CT.DM-P7Mechanisms for Transmitting Consent
PF-PR.AC-P4Access Permissions Managed
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)6 targets
PF-CT.DM-P7Mechanisms for Transmitting Consent
PF-PR.AC-P1Identity Management and Access Control
PF-PR.AC-P4Access Permissions Managed
PF-PR.AC-P5Network Integrity Protected
PF-PR.AC-P6Individuals Authenticated
PF-PR.DS-P4Adequate Capacity Maintained
ASD37-22Network segmentation (Excellent)
PF-PR.AC-P5Network Integrity Protected
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)2 targets
PF-PR.AC-P1Identity Management and Access Control
PF-PR.AC-P6Individuals Authenticated
ASD37-25Software firewall - inbound (Very Good)
PF-PR.AC-P5Network Integrity Protected
ASD37-27Outbound data loss prevention (Very Good)2 targets
NIST-PF-PCF-03Protect-P
PF-CM.AW-P4Data Retention Policies Communicated

Recovering Data and System Availability(2 mappings)

ASD37-34Regular backups (Essential)2 targets
PF-PR.PO-P3Backups Maintained
PF-PR.PO-P6Response and Recovery Plans Tested

+8 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

Other NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 covers 100 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution, where 13 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 14 map directly to NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?

23 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Privacy Framework 1.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST Privacy Framework 1.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.