ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)vsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges
See exactly how ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls map to MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) maps to MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges with 31% coverage across 42 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 136 ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls identifies 94 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Personnel Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 136 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 89 mapped controls across 11 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Personnel Security(15 mappings)
Gateways and Content Filtering(5 mappings)
+69 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) comparisons
Other MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) and MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?
ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) has 136 controls across its framework, while MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 42 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Personnel Security, where 16 ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls have no direct MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges equivalent.
How many controls map between ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) and MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?
Of 136 total ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls, 42 map directly to MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 94 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) to MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?
94 ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) controls have no direct equivalent in MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges. The highest concentration of gaps is in Personnel Security with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Information Security Manual (ISM) and MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?
The domain with the highest gap count is Personnel Security (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.