Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management SystemvsISO/IEC 27006:2024

See exactly how AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls map to ISO/IEC 27006:2024. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
51
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System maps to ISO/IEC 27006:2024 with 8% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls identifies 66 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(5 mappings)

8.5Control effectiveness review3 targets
ISO-15189-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions
ISO-15189-6.5Equipment calibration and metrological traceability
ISO-17025-6.5Metrological traceability
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
ISO-15189-6.8Externally provided products and services
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO-15189-6.8Externally provided products and services

Operation(1 mappings)

AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
ISO-15189-6.8Externally provided products and services

Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(4 mappings)

ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
ISO-15189-6.8Externally provided products and services
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS3 targets
ISO-15189-6.7Service agreements
ISO-17025-5.1Legal entity
ISO-17025-5.4Personnel for the management system

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO/IEC 27006:2024?

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System has 61 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27006:2024 covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 11 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27006:2024 equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO/IEC 27006:2024?

Of 61 total AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls, 6 map directly to ISO/IEC 27006:2024 controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 66 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System to ISO/IEC 27006:2024?

66 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27006:2024. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO/IEC 27006:2024?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.