Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 234vsSASB Standards

See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to SASB Standards. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 234 maps to SASB Standards with 17% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 732 frameworks | 512K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 512K+ mappings across 732 frameworks.

APRA CPS 234: Operational Resilience(3 mappings)

CPS234-11Business continuity planning and testing
SASB-BMI-2Business Model Resilience
CPS234-14Roles and Responsibilities
SASB-BMI-2Business Model Resilience
CPS234-15Information Security Capability
SASB-BMI-2Business Model Resilience

Governance(1 mappings)

CPS234-14Roles and Responsibilities
SASB-BMI-2Business Model Resilience

Capability(1 mappings)

CPS234-15Information Security Capability
SASB-BMI-2Business Model Resilience

Third Party(3 mappings)

CPS234-16Capability of Third Parties3 targets
SASB-LG-2Systemic Risk Management
SASB-LG-3Critical Incident Risk Management
SASB-LG-5Systemic Risk Management

APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management(9 mappings)

CPS234-16Capability of Third Parties3 targets
SASB-LG-2Systemic Risk Management
SASB-LG-3Critical Incident Risk Management
SASB-LG-5Systemic Risk Management
CPS234-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment3 targets
SASB-LG-2Systemic Risk Management
SASB-LG-3Critical Incident Risk Management
SASB-LG-5Systemic Risk Management
CPS234-20Information Asset Identification and Classification3 targets
SASB-LG-2Systemic Risk Management
SASB-LG-3Critical Incident Risk Management
SASB-LG-5Systemic Risk Management

Asset Management(3 mappings)

CPS234-20Information Asset Identification and Classification3 targets
SASB-LG-2Systemic Risk Management
SASB-LG-3Critical Incident Risk Management
SASB-LG-5Systemic Risk Management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 732 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 732 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (512K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and SASB Standards?

APRA CPS 234 has 35 controls across its framework, while SASB Standards covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting, where 5 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct SASB Standards equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and SASB Standards?

Of 35 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 10 map directly to SASB Standards controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to SASB Standards?

35 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in SASB Standards. The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and SASB Standards?

The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.