Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 234vsNIST SP 800-122

See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to NIST SP 800-122. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 234 maps to NIST SP 800-122 with 14% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 503K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 503K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.

APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls(2 mappings)

CPS234-08Application security controls
NIST122-18Regular security testing and assessment
CPS234-09Encryption and key management
NIST122-13Encryption of personal data

Controls(2 mappings)

CPS234-21Implementation of Controls2 targets
NIST122-16Data breach notification requirements
NIST122-17Security incident response procedures

APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting(6 mappings)

CPS234-21Implementation of Controls2 targets
NIST122-16Data breach notification requirements
NIST122-17Security incident response procedures
CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing2 targets
NIST122-16Data breach notification requirements
NIST122-17Security incident response procedures
CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security2 targets
NIST122-16Data breach notification requirements
NIST122-17Security incident response procedures

Assurance(2 mappings)

CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing2 targets
NIST122-16Data breach notification requirements
NIST122-17Security incident response procedures

Audit(2 mappings)

CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security2 targets
NIST122-16Data breach notification requirements
NIST122-17Security incident response procedures

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 730 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (503K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and NIST SP 800-122?

APRA CPS 234 has 35 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-122 covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management, where 5 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-122 equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and NIST SP 800-122?

Of 35 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 8 map directly to NIST SP 800-122 controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to NIST SP 800-122?

37 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-122. The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and NIST SP 800-122?

The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.