APRA CPS 234vsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
APRA CPS 234 maps to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) with 40% coverage across 21 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Information Security Governance.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 503K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 12 domains. Sign up to explore all 503K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.
APRA CPS 234: Information Security Governance(2 mappings)
APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls(4 mappings)
APRA CPS 234: Operational Resilience(4 mappings)
Governance(1 mappings)
Capability(1 mappings)
Third Party(3 mappings)
APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management(5 mappings)
+19 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 730 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other APRA CPS 234 comparisons
Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 730 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (503K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
APRA CPS 234 has 35 controls across its framework, while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 21 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Information Security Governance, where 4 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) equivalent.
How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
Of 35 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 21 map directly to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
24 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Information Security Governance with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Information Security Governance (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.