TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

API 1164vsOECD AI Principles

See exactly how API 1164 controls map to OECD AI Principles. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

API 1164 maps to OECD AI Principles with 17% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 API 1164 controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Risk(1 mappings)

API1164-02Risk Management Framework
→OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection

API 1164: Asset Identification & Governance(1 mappings)

API1164-02Risk Management Framework
→OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection

Access(1 mappings)

API1164-07Remote Access
→OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection

API 1164: Access Management(1 mappings)

API1164-07Remote Access
→OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection

Regulatory(2 mappings)

API1164-21TSA Pipeline Security Directive Alignment2 targets
→OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection
→OECDAI-5Data Governance, Training Data Quality, Privacy, and Bias Mitigation

API 1164: Supply Chain & Configuration(3 mappings)

API1164-21TSA Pipeline Security Directive Alignment2 targets
→OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection
→OECDAI-5Data Governance, Training Data Quality, Privacy, and Bias Mitigation
API1164-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
→OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection

Related Comparisons

Other API 1164 comparisons

API 1164 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 522 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security17 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIS2 Directive16 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEEE 168616 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEC 6244316 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIST SP 1800-3216 mappingsAPI 1164 vs ISO 2701916 mappingsAPI 1164 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappings

Other OECD AI Principles comparisons

Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) vs OECD AI Principles8 mappingsASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics vs OECD AI Principles7 mappingsColorado Artificial Intelligence Act (proposed SB 24-205) vs OECD AI Principles6 mappingsBrazil AI Framework vs OECD AI Principles6 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs OECD AI Principles6 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs OECD AI Principles5 mappingsPrivacy Act 2020 vs OECD AI Principles3 mappingsTurkey KVKK vs OECD AI Principles3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between API 1164 and OECD AI Principles?

API 1164 has 24 controls across its framework, while OECD AI Principles covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery, where 5 API 1164 controls have no direct OECD AI Principles equivalent.

How many controls map between API 1164 and OECD AI Principles?

Of 24 total API 1164 controls, 7 map directly to OECD AI Principles controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping API 1164 to OECD AI Principles?

38 API 1164 controls have no direct equivalent in OECD AI Principles. The highest concentration of gaps is in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between API 1164 and OECD AI Principles?

The domain with the highest gap count is API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.