TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

API 1164vsEN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)

See exactly how API 1164 controls map to EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

API 1164 maps to EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) with 8% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 API 1164 controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

API 1164: Access Management(2 mappings)

API1164-07Personnel risk assessment2 targets
→EN50126-3Risk Analysis and Evaluation
→EN50129-4Safety Integrity Level Allocation

API 1164: Supply Chain & Configuration(2 mappings)

API1164-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems2 targets
→EN50126-3Risk Analysis and Evaluation
→EN50129-4Safety Integrity Level Allocation

Related Comparisons

Other API 1164 comparisons

API 1164 vs NIST SP 1800-3216 mappingsAPI 1164 vs ISO 2701916 mappingsAPI 1164 vs DO-326A / ED-202A16 mappingsAPI 1164 vs BIMCO Cyber Security16 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEC 6244316 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIS2 Directive16 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEEE 168616 mappingsAPI 1164 vs C2M216 mappings

Other EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) comparisons

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsUS OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsISO/IEC 27557:2022 — Organisational Privacy Risk Management vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsCIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between API 1164 and EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)?

API 1164 has 24 controls across its framework, while EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery, where 5 API 1164 controls have no direct EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) equivalent.

How many controls map between API 1164 and EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)?

Of 24 total API 1164 controls, 2 map directly to EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping API 1164 to EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)?

22 API 1164 controls have no direct equivalent in EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS). The highest concentration of gaps is in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between API 1164 and EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)?

The domain with the highest gap count is API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.