Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11)vsRICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property
See exactly how Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls map to RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) maps to RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property with 32% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter I: General Provisions.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Chapter I: General Provisions(3 mappings)
Chapter IV: Controller and Processor Obligations(2 mappings)
Chapter VI: Data Protection Agency (APD)(1 mappings)
Chapter VII: Sanctions and Penalties(1 mappings)
Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) comparisons
Other RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property?
Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) has 31 controls across its framework, while RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter I: General Provisions, where 6 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls have no direct RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property equivalent.
How many controls map between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property?
Of 31 total Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls, 10 map directly to RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) to RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property?
21 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls have no direct equivalent in RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter I: General Provisions with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter I: General Provisions (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.