Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11)vsICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice — Data Integrity and Electronic Systems
See exactly how Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls map to ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice — Data Integrity and Electronic Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) maps to ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice — Data Integrity and Electronic Systems with 26% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Chapter I: General Provisions(3 mappings)
Chapter IV: Controller and Processor Obligations(2 mappings)
Chapter VI: Data Protection Agency (APD)(2 mappings)
Chapter VII: Sanctions and Penalties(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) comparisons
Other ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice — Data Integrity and Electronic Systems comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice — Data Integrity and Electronic Systems?
Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) has 31 controls across its framework, while ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice — Data Integrity and Electronic Systems covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects, where 7 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls have no direct ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice — Data Integrity and Electronic Systems equivalent.
How many controls map between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice — Data Integrity and Electronic Systems?
Of 31 total Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls, 8 map directly to ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice — Data Integrity and Electronic Systems controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) to ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice — Data Integrity and Electronic Systems?
23 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls have no direct equivalent in ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice — Data Integrity and Electronic Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice — Data Integrity and Electronic Systems?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.