Cross-Framework Mapping

Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11)vs3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)

See exactly how Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls map to 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) maps to 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) with 16% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter I: General Provisions(6 mappings)

AL-DPA-1Article 1 — Object of the Law2 targets
6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions
AL-DPA-3Article 3 — Definitions2 targets
6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions
BA-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions2 targets
6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions

Chapter V: International Data Transfers(2 mappings)

AO-DPA-15Article 21 — Transfer to Countries without Adequate Protection2 targets
TS33.501-13.1NF Registration and Discovery Security
TS33.501-13.4OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework

Chapter VI: Data Protection Agency (APD)(2 mappings)

AO-DPA-17Article 25 — Powers and Functions2 targets
6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions

Related Comparisons

Other Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) comparisons

Other 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)?

Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) has 31 controls across its framework, while 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects, where 7 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls have no direct 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) equivalent.

How many controls map between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)?

Of 31 total Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls, 5 map directly to 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) to 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)?

26 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls have no direct equivalent in 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.