Cross-Framework Mapping

Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)vsVirginia CDPA

See exactly how Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls map to Virginia CDPA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) maps to Virginia CDPA with 18% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Transfers(1 mappings)

AL-DPA-12International Data Transfers
VIRGINIAVCDPA-1Scope, Applicability, Definitions

Marketing(2 mappings)

AL-DPA-14Direct Marketing2 targets
VIRGINIAVCDPA-3Sensitive Data Consent and Children
VIRGINIAVCDPA-4Privacy Notice and DPIA

Incident Response(1 mappings)

AL-DPA-17Breach Handling
VIRGINIAVCDPA-3Sensitive Data Consent and Children

Rights(2 mappings)

AL-DPA-7Right of Access2 targets
VIRGINIAVCDPA-3Sensitive Data Consent and Children
VIRGINIAVCDPA-4Privacy Notice and DPIA

Related Comparisons

Other Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) comparisons

Other Virginia CDPA comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) and Virginia CDPA?

Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) has 22 controls across its framework, while Virginia CDPA covers 6 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Rights, where 3 Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls have no direct Virginia CDPA equivalent.

How many controls map between Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) and Virginia CDPA?

Of 22 total Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls, 4 map directly to Virginia CDPA controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) to Virginia CDPA?

18 Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls have no direct equivalent in Virginia CDPA. The highest concentration of gaps is in Rights with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) and Virginia CDPA?

The domain with the highest gap count is Rights (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.