Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)vsCOSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)
See exactly how Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls map to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) maps to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) with 14% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter I: General Provisions.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Chapter IV: Controller and Processor Obligations(2 mappings)
Chapter V: Supervisory Authority(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) comparisons
Other COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?
Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) has 28 controls across its framework, while COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter I: General Provisions, where 9 Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls have no direct COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) equivalent.
How many controls map between Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?
Of 28 total Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls, 4 map directly to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?
24 Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls have no direct equivalent in COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter I: General Provisions with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter I: General Provisions (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.