AICPA SOC 1vsUtah Consumer Privacy Act
See exactly how AICPA SOC 1 controls map to Utah Consumer Privacy Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
AICPA SOC 1 maps to Utah Consumer Privacy Act with 20% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AICPA SOC 1 controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AICPA SOC 1: Operational Resilience.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
AICPA SOC 1: Cybersecurity Controls(2 mappings)
AICPA SOC 1: Incident Management & Reporting(6 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other AICPA SOC 1 comparisons
Other Utah Consumer Privacy Act comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between AICPA SOC 1 and Utah Consumer Privacy Act?
AICPA SOC 1 has 25 controls across its framework, while Utah Consumer Privacy Act covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AICPA SOC 1: Operational Resilience, where 5 AICPA SOC 1 controls have no direct Utah Consumer Privacy Act equivalent.
How many controls map between AICPA SOC 1 and Utah Consumer Privacy Act?
Of 25 total AICPA SOC 1 controls, 5 map directly to Utah Consumer Privacy Act controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping AICPA SOC 1 to Utah Consumer Privacy Act?
20 AICPA SOC 1 controls have no direct equivalent in Utah Consumer Privacy Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in AICPA SOC 1: Operational Resilience with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between AICPA SOC 1 and Utah Consumer Privacy Act?
The domain with the highest gap count is AICPA SOC 1: Operational Resilience (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.