6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673)vsSerbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)
See exactly how 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) controls map to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) maps to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) with 37% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in General Provisions.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 59 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Jurisdiction and Cooperation(1 mappings)
Implementation(19 mappings)
+39 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) comparisons
Other Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) and Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?
6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) has 41 controls across its framework, while Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (37% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in General Provisions, where 13 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) controls have no direct Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) equivalent.
How many controls map between 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) and Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?
Of 41 total 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) controls, 16 map directly to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) controls — representing 37% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) to Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?
27 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) controls have no direct equivalent in Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in General Provisions with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) and Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)?
The domain with the highest gap count is General Provisions (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.