Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP SecurityvsDO-326A / ED-202A

See exactly how 3GPP Security controls map to DO-326A / ED-202A. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security maps to DO-326A / ED-202A with 23% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 3GPP Security controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3GPP Security: Information Security Policies.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

3GPP Security: Asset Management(1 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-08Information classification and labeling
DO326A-02System security categorization

3GPP Security: Access Control(9 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-12User access management and provisioning3 targets
DO326A-06Physical and logical access controls
DO326A-07Personnel risk assessment
DO326A-09Interactive remote access security
3GPP-SEC-13Authentication and password management3 targets
DO326A-06Physical and logical access controls
DO326A-07Personnel risk assessment
DO326A-09Interactive remote access security
3GPP-SEC-14Privileged access management3 targets
DO326A-06Physical and logical access controls
DO326A-07Personnel risk assessment
DO326A-09Interactive remote access security

3GPP Security: Operations Security(4 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-22Protection from malware
DO326A-12Malware prevention for operational systems
3GPP-SEC-23Backup and recovery procedures3 targets
DO326A-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
DO326A-17Recovery plan for critical systems
DO326A-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents

3GPP Security: Communications Security(1 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-27Network security management
DO326A-13Network security monitoring

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security and DO-326A / ED-202A?

3GPP Security has 31 controls across its framework, while DO-326A / ED-202A covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3GPP Security: Information Security Policies, where 5 3GPP Security controls have no direct DO-326A / ED-202A equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security and DO-326A / ED-202A?

Of 31 total 3GPP Security controls, 7 map directly to DO-326A / ED-202A controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security to DO-326A / ED-202A?

24 3GPP Security controls have no direct equivalent in DO-326A / ED-202A. The highest concentration of gaps is in 3GPP Security: Information Security Policies with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security and DO-326A / ED-202A?

The domain with the highest gap count is 3GPP Security: Information Security Policies (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.