CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) CFTC-SS-33: Regular Periodic Objective Testing and Review of Automated Systems

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 31 controls across 17 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 5 controls

CCM-A&A-01 Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures
CCM-A&A-02 Independent Assessments
CCM-A&A-03 Risk Based Planning Assessment
CCM-A&A-05 Audit Management Process
CCM-STA-11 Internal Compliance Testing

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 3 controls

161R1-CA-2 Control Assessments
161R1-CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
161R1-PM-14 Testing, Training, and Monitoring

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

11.1.1 11.1.1 Requirement 11 policies and procedures managed
11.3.1 11.3.1 Quarterly internal vulnerability scans
11.4.2 11.4.2 Internal penetration testing annually and after change

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-18.1 Establish and Maintain a Penetration Testing Program
CIS-7.5 Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Internal Enterprise Assets

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

CA-2 Control Assessments
CA-7 Continuous Monitoring

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

CA-2 Control Assessments
CA-7 Continuous Monitoring

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 2 controls

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-02 Improvements are identified from security tests and exercises, including those done in coordination with suppliers and relevant third parties
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-08 Processes for receiving, analyzing, and responding to vulnerability disclosures are established

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

03.12.01 Security Assessment
03.12.03 Continuous Monitoring

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

NIST800-CA-7 CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
NIST800-PM-14 PM-14 Testing, Training, and Monitoring

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

PV-5 Perform vulnerability assessments

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-OPS-19 Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Penetration Tests

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

CA.L2-3.12.3 Security Control Monitoring

DORA · 1 control

DORA-Art.24 General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(8) Evaluation (Standard)

ISO 22301:2019 · 1 control

9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(8) Evaluation (Standard)

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) have you already done?

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) CFTC-SS-33 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and 28 of 39 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.071.8% covered · 11 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate69.2% covered · 12 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.161.5% covered · 15 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)59% covered · 16 gaps If you hold DORA51.3% covered · 19 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-161 Rev 148.7% covered · 20 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 5 were rejected on the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free