NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 NIST800-RA-10: RA-10 Threat Hunting

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 32 controls across 12 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 8 controls

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-02 Potentially adverse events are analyzed to better understand associated activities
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-03 Information is correlated from multiple sources
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07 Cyber threat intelligence and other contextual information are integrated into the analysis
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01 Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-09 Computing hardware and software, runtime environments, and their data are monitored to find potentially adverse events
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-03 Internal and external threats to the organization are identified and recorded
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-05 Threats, vulnerabilities, likelihoods, and impacts are used to understand inherent risk and inform risk response prioritization
NIST-CSF-RS.AN-03 Analysis is performed to establish what has taken place during an incident and the root cause of the incident

PCI DSS 4.0 · 5 controls

10.4.1 10.4.1 Daily review of security-relevant logs
10.4.1.1 10.4.1.1 Automated mechanisms used for audit log review
10.7.1 10.7.1 Service providers detect critical control failures (superseded)
11.5.1 11.5.1 IDS/IPS monitoring of CDE traffic
11.5.1.1 11.5.1.1 Service providers detect covert malware channels

ISO 27001:2022 · 4 controls

5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
5.7 Threat intelligence
8.15 Logging
8.16 Monitoring activities

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 2 controls

SEC01-BP04 Stay up to date with security threats and recommendations
SEC04-BP03 Correlate and enrich security alerts

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-IR-4 Detection and analysis - investigate an incident
LT-5 Centralize security log management and analysis

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-13.2 Deploy a Host-Based Intrusion Detection Solution
CIS-16.14 Conduct Threat Modeling

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-IVS-09 Network Defense
CCM-LOG-05 Audit Logs Monitoring and Response

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

5.7 Threat intelligence
8.16 Monitoring activities

SOC 2 · 2 controls

SOC2-CC7.1 CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
SOC2-CC7.2 CC7.2 Monitoring system components for anomalies

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-31 Hunt to discover incidents (Very Good)

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-RA-10 Threat Hunting

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.11.2e Threat Hunting

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 have you already done?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 NIST800-RA-10 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 163 of 1014 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27001:202216.1% covered · 851 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202210.8% covered · 904 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.110.2% covered · 911 gaps If you hold CIS Controls v810.1% covered · 912 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 310.1% covered · 912 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)9.6% covered · 917 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 342 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free