CMMC 2.0 AU.L2-3.3.3: Event Review

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 44 controls across 21 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 5 controls

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-02 Potentially adverse events are analyzed to better understand associated activities
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-04 Log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring
NIST-CSF-RS.AN-03 Analysis is performed to establish what has taken place during an incident and the root cause of the incident
NIST-CSF-RS.AN-07 Incident data and metadata are collected, and their integrity and provenance are preserved
NIST-CSF-RS.AN-08 An incident's magnitude is estimated and validated

SOC 2 · 5 controls

SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)
SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)
SOC2-CC7.1 CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
SOC2-CC7.2 CC7.2 Monitoring system components for anomalies
SOC2-CC7.3 CC7.3 Evaluating security events to identify incidents

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

CIS-13.1 Centralize Security Event Alerting
CIS-13.11 Tune Security Event Alerting Thresholds
CIS-8.1 Establish and Maintain an Audit Log Management Process
CIS-8.11 Conduct Audit Log Reviews

ISO 27001:2022 · 4 controls

5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security
8.15 Logging
8.16 Monitoring activities

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

5.25 Assessment and decision on information security events
8.15 Logging
8.16 Monitoring activities

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 3 controls

NIST800-AU-2 AU-2 Event Logging
NIST800-AU-6 AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
NIST800-PM-31 PM-31 Continuous Monitoring Strategy

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

10.4.1 10.4.1 Daily review of security-relevant logs
10.4.1.1 10.4.1.1 Automated mechanisms used for audit log review
12.4.2 12.4.2 Quarterly reviews that personnel follow security procedures

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-LT-1 Enable threat detection capabilities
ASBv3-LT-2 Enable threat detection for identity and access management

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

C5-OPS-10 Logging and Monitoring - Concept
C5-OPS-13 Logging and Monitoring - Identification of Events

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

03.03.01 Event Logging
03.03.05 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting

ACSC Essential Eight · 1 control

E8-UAH-ML3 User Application Hardening - Maturity Level 3

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-36 Enable and Configure Logging on the Most Important Components

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC04-BP03 Correlate and enrich security alerts

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

CFTC-SS-3 Information Security Category

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-LOG-07 Logging Scope

FedRAMP High · 1 control

AU-2 Event Logging

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) Information System Activity Review (Required)

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-AU-6 Audit Review, Analysis, and Reporting

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) Information System Activity Review (Required)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of CMMC 2.0 have you already done?

CMMC 2.0 AU.L2-3.3.3 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of CMMC 2.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold FedRAMP Moderate and 108 of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold FedRAMP Moderate98.2% covered · 2 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 394.5% covered · 6 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 585.5% covered · 16 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202279.1% covered · 23 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202267.3% covered · 36 gaps If you hold CIS Controls v864.5% covered · 39 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 1 were rejected on the FedRAMP Moderate pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free