An FPI, working with its SI, selects IaaS, PaaS, SaaS or FaaS (serverless) on a thorough analysis of its technical and operational needs, guided by fiscally responsible use of public funds: public IaaS and PaaS suit variable demand, while managed private or hybrid models are considered for stable, high-utilisation applications; the Sovereign Cloud Governance Committee may advise NITDA on model use and NITDA may guide the choice through IT project clearance.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.