Judge how well information security performs and how effective the ISMS is; decide what to monitor and measure, security processes and controls included; which methods of monitoring, measuring, analysing and evaluating give valid (comparable and reproducible) results; when monitoring and measuring happen and who does them; when the results are analysed and evaluated and who does that; and keep suitable documented evidence of the results. Held link: the 27003 introduction says it gives no detailed treatment of this topic and points to ISO/IEC 27004, and its guidance on 5.1 names 9.1 a) measurements as a source of status reports for top management. Implementation points (general practice): draw measures from the objectives and the most important controls, and use the results in management review.
This control maps to 12 controls across 11 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 12 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.