Put in place, document, run and keep up an anti-bribery system, with the processes it needs and the way they interact, and keep reviewing it and improving it where needed. It has to include measures that find and weigh bribery risk and that stop bribery, uncover it and respond to it, and it must be reasonable and proportionate given the matters weighed for scope under 4.3. The standard accepts that no system can remove bribery risk entirely or catch every case.
This control maps to 10 controls across 10 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 10 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.