ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Context of the organization – ISO/IEC 42001:2023

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 4.4: AI management system

Set up an AI management system, put it into effect, keep it running and documented and keep improving it, including the processes it needs and how they interact, as the standard requires.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 35 controls across 21 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27001:2022 · 4 controls

  • 5.1 Policies for information security
  • 5.2 Information security roles and responsibilities
  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security
  • 5.37 Documented operating procedures
  • NIST-CSF-GV.PO-01 Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is established based on organizational context, cybersecurity strategy, and priorities and is communicated and enforced
  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03 Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk management processes
  • NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04 Strategic direction that describes appropriate risk response options is established and communicated
  • NIST-CSF-GV.RR-01 Organizational leadership is responsible and accountable for cybersecurity risk and fosters a culture that is risk-aware, ethical, and continually improving

PCI DSS 4.0 · 4 controls

  • 12.1.1 12.1.1 Overall information security policy established and disseminated
  • 12.1.2 12.1.2 Security policy reviewed annually and updated as needed
  • 2.1.1 2.1.1 Requirement 2 policies and procedures governed
  • 4.1.1 4.1.1 Requirement 4 policies and procedures maintained and communicated

SOC 2 · 4 controls

  • SOC2-CC1.3 CC1.3 Structures, reporting lines, authorities and responsibilities (COSO principle 3)
  • SOC2-CC3.1 CC3.1 Objectives specified clearly enough to assess risk (COSO principle 6)
  • SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)
  • SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)
  • ISO-17025-8.2 Management system documentation
  • 8.2 Management system documentation (Option A)

ISO/IEC 38500:2024 · 2 controls

  • 6.3 Management of IT practice
  • 7.2 Elements of the framework
  • C.4 C.4 Standards cornerstone: align with relevant AI standards

ISO 14001:2015 · 1 control

  • 4.4 Environmental management system
  • ISO-15189-8.2 Management system documentation

ISO 22000:2018 · 1 control

  • 4.4 Food safety management system

ISO 22301:2019 · 1 control

  • 4.4 Business continuity management system

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

  • 4.4 Customer

ISO 37001:2016 · 1 control

  • 4.4 4.4 Anti-bribery management system

ISO 37301:2021 · 1 control

  • 4.4 Compliance management system

ISO 45001:2018 · 1 control

  • 4.4 OH&S management system
  • 4.4 Energy management system

ISO 55001:2014 · 1 control

  • 4.4 Asset management system

ISO 9001:2015 · 1 control

  • 4.4 Quality management system and its processes
  • 27006-9.2 Management System Requirements
  • 4.3 4.3 Align AI governance and assurance with Standard A

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Context of the organization – ISO/IEC 42001:2023

You are reading one control. How much of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 have you already done?

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 4.4 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and 30 of 38 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 35 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.