ISO 27701:2019 6.6.1: Business requirements of access control

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 53 controls across 19 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

PCI DSS 4.0 · 9 controls

1.3.1 1.3.1 Inbound CDE traffic restricted
1.4.4 1.4.4 Cardholder data stores not reachable from untrusted networks
7.1.1 7.1.1 Requirement 7 policies and procedures maintained
7.2.1 7.2.1 Access control model defined
7.3.3 7.3.3 Access control default deny all
3.4.1 3.4.1 PAN masked on display except for authorized roles
7.2.4 7.2.4 User accounts and privileges reviewed every six months
7.2.5 7.2.5 Application and system accounts least privilege
7.3.1 7.3.1 Need-to-know access control system covers all components

CIS Controls v8 · 8 controls

CIS-12.7 Ensure Remote Devices Utilize a VPN and are Connecting to an Enterprise’s AAA Infrastructure
CIS-13.5 Manage Access Control for Remote Assets
CIS-13.9 Deploy Port-Level Access Control
CIS-3.12 Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity
CIS-5.1 Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Accounts
CIS-6.1 Establish an Access Granting Process
CIS-6.2 Establish an Access Revoking Process
CIS-6.8 Define and Maintain Role-Based Access Control

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 6 controls

NIST800-AC-1 AC-1 Policy and Procedures
NIST800-AC-14 AC-14 Permitted Actions Without Identification or Authentication
NIST800-AC-2 AC-2 Account Management
NIST800-AC-6 AC-6 Least Privilege
NIST800-PL-4 PL-4 Rules of Behavior
SP800-53-AC Access Control Family

CMMC 2.0 · 5 controls

AC.L2-3.1.1 Authorized Access Control
AC.L2-3.1.2 Transaction & Function Control
AC.L2-3.1.4 Separation of Duties
AC.L2-3.1.5 Least Privilege
IA.L2-3.5.2 Authentication

SOC 2 · 4 controls

SOC2-CC6.1 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
SOC2-CC6.2 CC6.2 Registering and authorising users before issuing credentials
SOC2-CC6.3 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties
SOC2-P5.1 P5.1 Data subject access

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 2 controls

SEC03-BP01 Define access requirements
SEC03-BP02 Grant least privilege access

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-GS-2 Define and implement enterprise segmentation/separation of duties strategy
ASBv3-GS-6 Define and implement identity and privileged access strategy

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

C5-COS-04 Cross-network access
C5-IDM-01 Policy for user accounts and access rights

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-IAM-01 Identity and Access Management Policy and Procedures
CCM-IVS-03 Network Security

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

AC-1 Policy and Procedures
AC-3 Access Enforcement

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

AC-1 Policy and Procedures
AC-3 Access Enforcement

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

5.15 Access control
8.3 Information access restriction

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) · 1 control

AUCDR-IS-1 Limit risk of unauthorised access to the CDR data environment

ISO 27017:2015 · 1 control

9.1 Business requirements of access control

ISO 27018:2019 · 1 control

9.1 Business requirements of access control

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-AC-1 Policy and Procedures

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.15.01 Policy and Procedures

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of ISO 27701:2019 have you already done?

ISO 27701:2019 6.6.1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 27701:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold SOC 2 and 58 of 108 ISO 27701:2019 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold SOC 253.7% covered · 50 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.147.2% covered · 57 gaps If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.047.2% covered · 57 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202243.5% covered · 61 gaps If you hold Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)35.2% covered · 70 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)34.3% covered · 71 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 289 were rejected on the SOC 2 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free