ISO 27701:2019
PIMS-specific guidance related to ISO/IEC 27002, ISO 27701:2019

ISO 27701:2019 6.12.2: Supplier service delivery management

Monitoring and review of supplier services and management of changes to those services apply as the base guidance requires, read as covering suppliers that process personal data.

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 47 controls across 19 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 7 controls

CIS Controls v8 · 6 controls

  • CIS-15.1 Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Service Providers
  • CIS-15.2 Establish and Maintain a Service Provider Management Policy
  • CIS-15.3 Classify Service Providers
  • CIS-15.5 Assess Service Providers
  • CIS-15.6 Monitor Service Providers
  • CIS-15.7 Securely Decommission Service Providers
  • NIST-CSF-DE.CM-06 External service provider activities and services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
  • NIST-CSF-GV.SC-07 The risks posed by a supplier, their products and services, and other third parties are understood, recorded, prioritized, assessed, responded to, and monitored over the course of the relationship
  • NIST-CSF-GV.SC-10 Cybersecurity supply chain risk management plans include provisions for activities that occur after the conclusion of a partnership or service agreement
  • NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04 Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
  • NIST-CSF-ID.AM-08 Systems, hardware, software, services, and data are managed throughout their life cycles

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 3 controls

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

  • 12.8.4 TPSP compliance monitored
  • 12.8.5 Responsibility matrix with TPSPs
  • 8.2.7 Third-party access managed

SOC 2 · 3 controls

  • SOC2-CC9.2 Risk mitigation activities include assessment of vendor and business partner controls
  • SOC2-P6.4 Obtains privacy commitments from vendors and other third parties who have access to personal information to meet the entity's objectives related to privacy. The entity assesses those parties' compliance on a periodic and as-needed
  • SOC2-P6.5 Obtains commitments from vendors and other third parties with access to personal information to notify the entity in the event of actual or suspected unauthorized disclosures of personal information. Such notifications are reported to

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

  • C5-SSO-02 Risk assessment of service providers and suppliers
  • C5-SSO-04 Monitoring of compliance with requirements

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

  • SA-9 External System Services
  • SR-6 Supplier Assessments and Reviews (SR-6)

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

  • SA-9 External System Services
  • SR-6 Supplier Assessments and Reviews (SR-6)
  • SA-9 External System Services
  • SR-6 Supplier Assessments and Reviews (SR-6)
  • SA-9 External System Services
  • SR-6 Supplier Assessments and Reviews (SR-6)

APPI · 1 control

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.22 Monitoring, review and change management of supplier services

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.22 Monitoring, review and change management of supplier services

ISO 27017:2015 · 1 control

  • 15.2 Supplier service delivery management
  • SA-9 External System Services

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in PIMS-specific guidance related to ISO/IEC 27002, ISO 27701:2019

You are reading one control. How much of ISO 27701:2019 have you already done?

ISO 27701:2019 6.12.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 27701:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold SOC 2 and 58 of 108 ISO 27701:2019 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 289 were rejected on the SOC 2 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 47 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.