Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-GS-6: Define and implement identity and privileged access strategy

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 38 controls across 24 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 3 controls

ANSSI-HYG-05 Maintain an Exhaustive Inventory of Privileged Accounts
ANSSI-HYG-08 Identify Each Person by Name and Separate User and Administrator Roles
ANSSI-HYG-10 Define and Verify Password Selection and Sizing Rules

CIS Controls v8 · 3 controls

CIS-5.4 Restrict Administrator Privileges to Dedicated Administrator Accounts
CIS-6.1 Establish an Access Granting Process
CIS-6.2 Establish an Access Revoking Process

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

5.1 Policies for information security
5.15 Access control
8.2 Privileged access rights

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

7.1.1 7.1.1 Requirement 7 policies and procedures maintained
7.2.1 7.2.1 Access control model defined
8.1.1 8.1.1 Requirement 8 policies and procedures maintained

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 2 controls

SEC02-BP04 Rely on a centralized identity provider
SEC03-BP01 Define access requirements

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

AC-1 Policy and Procedures
IA-1 Policy and Procedures

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

AC-1 Policy and Procedures
IA-1 Policy and Procedures

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

5.1 Policies for information security
5.15 Access control

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

NIST800-AC-1 AC-1 Policy and Procedures
NIST800-IA-1 IA-1 Policy and Procedures

UK Cyber Essentials · 2 controls

CE-AC.1 User Account Approval Process
CE-SC.5 Password-Based Authentication Quality

APRA CPS 234 · 1 control

CPS234-19 Information Security Policy Framework

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) · 1 control

AUCDR-IS-1 Limit risk of unauthorised access to the CDR data environment

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 · 1 control

MYHR-SEC-1 Written security and access policy

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-IDM-01 Policy for user accounts and access rights

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

CFTC-SS-3 Information Security Category

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

AC.L2-3.1.5 Least Privilege

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-IAM-01 Identity and Access Management Policy and Procedures

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(4)(i) Information Access Management (Standard)

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

6.6.1 Business requirements of access control

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-GV.PO-01 Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is established based on organizational context, cybersecurity strategy, and priorities and is communicated and enforced

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-AC-6 Least Privilege

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.15.01 Policy and Procedures

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(4)(i) Information Access Management (Standard)

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC6.1 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of Azure Security Benchmark have you already done?

Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-GS-6 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of Azure Security Benchmark your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 71 of 85 Azure Security Benchmark controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 583.5% covered · 14 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate78.8% covered · 18 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.172.9% covered · 23 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202269.4% covered · 26 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)65.9% covered · 29 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202261.2% covered · 33 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free