CIS Controls v8 CIS-13.9: Deploy Port-Level Access Control

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 57 controls across 14 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

FedRAMP High · 8 controls

AC-18 Wireless Access
AC-18(1) Authentication and Encryption
AC-3 Access Enforcement
AC-4(21) Physical or Logical Separation of Information Flows
CA-9 Internal System Connections
CM-7 Least Functionality
IA-3 Device Identification and Authentication
SC-7(5) Deny by Default Allow by Exception

FedRAMP Moderate · 8 controls

AC-18 Wireless Access
AC-18(1) Authentication and Encryption
AC-3 Access Enforcement
AC-4(21) Physical or Logical Separation of Information Flows
CA-9 Internal System Connections
CM-7 Least Functionality
IA-3 Device Identification and Authentication
SC-7(5) Deny by Default Allow by Exception

PCI DSS 4.0 · 8 controls

1.2.5 1.2.5 Allowed services, protocols and ports justified
1.2.6 1.2.6 Security features for insecure services in use
1.3.1 1.3.1 Inbound CDE traffic restricted
1.3.2 1.3.2 Outbound CDE traffic restricted
1.4.1 1.4.1 NSCs between trusted and untrusted networks
11.5.1 11.5.1 IDS/IPS monitoring of CDE traffic
7.3.3 7.3.3 Access control default deny all
9.2.2 9.2.2 Controls on publicly accessible network jacks

CMMC 2.0 · 7 controls

AC.L2-3.1.14 Remote Access Routing
AC.L2-3.1.16 Wireless Access Authorization
AC.L2-3.1.17 Wireless Access Protection
AC.L2-3.1.2 Transaction & Function Control
SC.L2-3.13.1 Boundary Protection
SC.L2-3.13.12 Collaborative Device Control
SC.L2-3.13.6 Network Communication by Exception

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 7 controls

NIST800-AC-18 AC-18 Wireless Access
NIST800-AC-24 AC-24 Access Control Decisions
NIST800-AC-3 AC-3 Access Enforcement
NIST800-CA-9 CA-9 Internal System Connections
NIST800-IA-3 IA-3 Device Identification and Authentication
NIST800-SC-5 SC-5 Denial-of-service Protection
NIST800-SC-7 SC-7 Boundary Protection

SOC 2 · 5 controls

SOC2-CC6.1 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
SOC2-CC6.2 CC6.2 Registering and authorising users before issuing credentials
SOC2-CC6.3 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties
SOC2-CC6.6 CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary
SOC2-CC6.7 CC6.7 Restricting and protecting information in transmission, movement and removal

ISO 27701:2019 · 4 controls

6.10 Communications security
6.10.1 Network security management
6.6 Access control
6.6.1 Business requirements of access control

Australian Information Security Manual · 2 controls

ISM-0520 Blocking unauthorised network devices
ISM-1321 802.1X with EAP-TLS only

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

8.20 Networks security
8.5 Secure authentication

NIST SP 800-172 · 2 controls

3.1.2e Restrict Access to Organization-Owned, Provisioned, or Issued Information Resources
3.5.1e Identification of Systems, Components, and Devices

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-07 Authorise Network Connection Only for Managed Equipment

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01 Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.05.02 Device Identification and Authentication

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of CIS Controls v8 have you already done?

CIS Controls v8 CIS-13.9 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of CIS Controls v8 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 102 of 153 CIS Controls v8 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27001:202266.7% covered · 51 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate62.7% covered · 57 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 557.5% covered · 65 gaps If you hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.050.3% covered · 76 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202249.7% covered · 77 gaps If you hold Azure Security Benchmark49% covered · 78 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 240 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free