ISO 22301:2019
Performance evaluation, ISO 22301:2019

ISO 22301:2019 9.2: Internal audit

Audit the BCMS internally on a planned basis, and run the audit programme that makes those audits objective, competent and consequential.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykControl text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 66 controls across 42 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 5 controls

  • NIST800-AU-6 AU-6 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
  • NIST800-CA-2 CA-2 Control Assessments
  • NIST800-CA-7 CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
  • NIST800-PM-14 PM-14 Testing, Training, and Monitoring
  • SP800-53-CA Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring Family

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.35 Independent review of information security
  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security
  • 9.2.2 Internal audit programme
  • 4.5.5 Internal Audit
  • SPC1-4.5.6 Internal Audit

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CMMC 2.0 · 2 controls

ISO 14001:2015 · 2 controls

  • 9.2 Internal audit
  • 9.2.2 Internal audit programme

ISO 19011:2018 · 2 controls

  • 6.2 Initiating audit
  • 6.2.3 Determining feasibility of audit
  • ISO-37002-9.2 Internal audit
  • ISO37002-9.2 Internal Audit

ISO 37301:2021 · 2 controls

  • 9.2 Internal audit
  • 9.2.2 Internal audit programme
  • ISO-39001-9.2 Internal audit
  • ISO39001-9.2 Internal Audit
  • ISO-41001-9.2 Internal audit
  • ISO41001-9.2 Internal Audit

ISO 45001:2018 · 2 controls

  • 9.2 Internal audit
  • 9.2.2 Internal audit programme
  • ISO-50001-9.3 Internal audit
  • 9.2 Internal audit

ISO 56002 · 2 controls

  • ISO-56002-9.2 Internal audit
  • ISO56002-9.2 Internal audit

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 · 2 controls

  • NIST-CSF-ID.IM-02 Improvements are identified from security tests and exercises, including those done in coordination with suppliers and relevant third parties
  • NIST-CSF-ID.RA-08 Processes for receiving, analyzing, and responding to vulnerability disclosures are established

SOC 2 · 2 controls

  • SOC2-CC4.1 CC4.1 Ongoing and separate evaluations of control (COSO principle 16)
  • SOC2-CC4.2 CC4.2 Evaluating and communicating control deficiencies (COSO principle 17)
  • CPS220-11 Annual Audit Review of the Framework
  • CPS230-16 Internal Audit Review of the Business Continuity Plan
  • AS9100D-9.2 Internal Audit

FedRAMP High · 1 control

  • CA-2 Control Assessments

FedRAMP Moderate · 1 control

  • CA-2 Control Assessments

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

ISO 13485:2016 · 1 control

ISO 14004:2016 · 1 control

  • 9.2 Internal audit

ISO 22000:2018 · 1 control

  • 9.2 Internal audit

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.35 Independent review of information security

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

  • ISO28001-4.17 Internal audit

ISO 30401 · 1 control

  • ISO30401-9.2 Internal audit

ISO 37001:2016 · 1 control

  • 9.2 9.2 Internal audit

ISO 55001:2014 · 1 control

  • 9.2 Internal audit

ISO 9001:2015 · 1 control

  • 9.2 Internal audit

ISO/IEC 27031:2011 · 1 control

  • 27031-9.2 Internal Audit

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

  • 9.2 Internal audit
  • 53A-3.1 Prepare for Control Assessments

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 12.4.2 12.4.2 Quarterly reviews that personnel follow security procedures

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Performance evaluation, ISO 22301:2019

You are reading one control. How much of ISO 22301:2019 have you already done?

ISO 22301:2019 9.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 22301:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and 28 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 66 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.