The review must lead to decisions on chances for continual improvement and on any changes that would make the BCMS more efficient and effective. These cover changes to scope; updates to the business impact analysis, the risk assessment, the strategies, the solutions and the plans; changes to procedures and controls so they respond to internal or external issues; and the way control effectiveness is to be measured. Keep documented evidence of the outcome, tell the relevant interested parties about it, and act on it as appropriate.
This control maps to 9 controls across 6 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
ISO 22301:2019 9.3.3 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 22301:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and 28 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 9 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.