For each appointed party (internal teams being treated as though formally appointed), the lead appointed party shall set out its EIR: every requirement it passes down from the appointing party together with its own; the level of information need; the acceptance criteria (standard, procedures, shared resources); due dates measured against milestones, leaving time for review and assurance; and supporting material the appointed party may need.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.