The appointing party shall set, inside the project's information standard, any information standards peculiar to its organization. It considers information exchanged inside its organization, with outside stakeholders, with operators and maintainers, between itself and the lead appointed party, among appointed parties and between projects that depend on one another; how information is to be structured and classified; how levels of information need are allocated; and how information will be used once the asset is in operation.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.