It is made clear how existing regulation such as the IT Act governs developers, deployers and end-users; each entity carries obligations proportionate to its function and risk of harm (transparency reporting, content removal, grievance redressal, legal assistance); laws are enforced through timely and consistent action so that violations by AI systems or failures of due diligence are deterred; and guidance such as a master circular listing applicable regulations, guidance notes and model codes from bodies like the AI Safety Institute explains how existing law applies, within a graded liability approach proportionate to function, anticipated risk and due diligence, with enforcement aimed at preventing harm yet leaving room for responsible innovation.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.