Category 4 covers elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation. ILO Convention C100 Equal Remuneration (1951): equal remuneration for men and women workers for work of equal value; principle of equal value (not just equal work) including comparison of jobs of different content; methods of objective appraisal of jobs on basis of work performed + classification + payment structures. ILO Convention C111 Discrimination Employment and Occupation (1958): elimination of discrimination on grounds of: race + colour + sex + religion + political opinion + national extraction + social origin + other grounds determined by national consultation (commonly extended to age + disability + sexual orientation + gender identity + HIV/AIDS status + marital status + pregnancy + family responsibilities + migrant status + indigenous status). Discrimination covers: hiring + access to occupations + access to vocational training + terms and conditions of employment + dismissal. Practical implementation: equal opportunity policy + anti-discrimination policy + diverse and inclusive workplace + gender pay gap reporting + employee resource groups + harassment and discrimination grievance mechanism + diversity equity inclusion (DEI) programmes + reasonable accommodations + return-to-work after maternity/parental leave + non-discriminatory recruitment + promotion + training. Special measures: positive action for under-represented groups + affirmative action where lawful. Coordinates with UN Global Compact Principle 6 (elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation) + UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) + UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) + ICERD + EU Equal Treatment + EU Anti-Discrimination Directives + US EEOC + UK Equality Act 2010 + GRI 405 + 406 + sectoral DEI initiatives. ILO FPRW Cat 4 + C100 + C111 + Discrimination + Equal Remuneration applies.
This control maps to 6 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 6 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.